Sachin Tendulkar and Comparisons
One thing that will never fade away in the cricketing history is comparisons. It is nothing new to cricket; it was there between Hammond and Bradman. While Hammond always led the runs tally and high score, Bradman was ahead in the number of centuries and average. People supporting Hammond said that he is an exceptional bowler as well (who took 736 first class wickets) and a great natural athlete (a good soccer player too).
If comparisons haunted someone so badly, then it should be Sachin Tendulkar. In his early days, he was constantly compared with Brian Lara, then later when Lara slowed down, he was compared with Mark Waugh, and then later with Saeed Anwar in ODIs (Saeed Anwar for a brief phase had more ODI centuries than Sachin), he was compared with Steve Waugh, later with Inzamam, and then with Lara again and after Lara’s retirement with Ponting. Recently Mr Ian Chappel went on to compare Duminy with Sachin. It has been three different eras, but only one thing remained unchanged and that is Sachin.

The reason behind this is simple. If there is a universally accepted notion, then there will be a few who will question it and contradict it with another theory. The Universally accepted notion is Sachin is the greatest batsman the cricketing world has ever seen. Few people would always like to say something against this, for conveying their opinion they tend to take other players for comparison. People keep comparing Dravid, Ganguly, Ponting, Lara and lot others with Sachin. “Great men compare their achievements with their goals, while others compare their achievements with those of other people”. The fact is Sachin has set some goals and he is striving hard to achieve them, he is least bothered about what his contemporaries are doing. If he had gone after other people’s records he would have achieved much less.
Sachin when he scored 200* in an ODI many experts came out saying that he is the greatest cricketer ever and even rated him higher than Bradman.
Sachin rubbished all those comparisons and said that he is never in to comparisons and it is not fair to compare. While we can dwell on how he is far better than his contemporary players like Lara, Ponting and others, by bringing out facts and figures. It will be futile, because the people who are hell bent against accepting the truth are not going to accept it, no matter how well we put the facts. People who say that when Sachin scores a century India will lose, will keep saying that though Sachin to his credit has 33 centuries on winning cause and no other batsman in the world ever scored even 30 centuries. People who say that he has not won many matches for India fail to understand that he has the maximum number of man of the matches and man of the series awards. People who say that he is playing only for centuries will never accept the fact that he has the most number 90s than anyone. People who say that he fails in important matches will never accept the fact that he has scored the maximum runs; he has the maximum number of centuries and the highest average among all the players in finals. It is absolutely futile to bring out these facts, because the people who don’t want to accept the facts will come up with the same points again.
So Instead of dwelling on these facts and comparisons, we shall look at the similarity between two of the greatest ever to have played the game; Sir Don Bradman and Sachin Tendulkar.
Greatness of a sportsperson should never be measured in terms of their sporting achievements alone, but should be based on what difference they made (not only to the sport).
Lance Armstrong created great records but what made is more special is he fought against testicular cancer and came back to create those records. Valentio Rossi by proving that the racer is more important than the machine took biking to the next level. Joe Montana of NFL playing after taking intravenous fluid and coming back and winning the match, he changed the way NFL quarterback played. There are few others who changed the sport and changed the way people looked at it.
When it comes to Cricket, there are two names that come to mind; Don Bradman and Sachin Tendulkar. They are similar in quite a few ways.
Technique:
While Don himself had said that Sachin’s batting resembled his batting, there are similarities other than their batting too. Many agree to this fact and some experts do believe that Sachin had slightly better technique, as his came down straight unlike Bradman for whom the bat came down from direction of the gully.
Standing Out:
It is humanly impossible for an Australian to break the record of Bradman, likewise it is almost impossible for someone to break the record of Sachin. Even if that happens in the future, that will not take anything away from Don.
People who rate Don as the greatest will often say that he played on uncovered pitches and without helmet and so on, forgeting the fact that until the bodyline series bowlers never bowled bouncers or balls down the leg as a negative tactic. When Bradman faced a barrage of bouncers his average in that series was just half of his career average. There was never a need for helmets until then; bowlers never had the amount of variety or improvisation until then. Bradman never played on great number of tracks or under different conditions. Bradman never played different formats, and never had this much of workload like the current crop of players. The fielding standard was not comparable to current day standards. Despite all these, what made him special is the way he stood away from the rest. All these factors are common for all the players who played in that era, but still Bradman was way above the rest. Likewise Sachin stands far apart from the rest; there is literally no contemporary player who can match his stats. The fact is Sachin is not just leading the way, but is way ahead of all other players so it is literally impossible for someone to even come close leave alone overtaking.
Many say that Bradman’s average was way above comparison, like wise Sachin’s number of international centuries will be.
Intuition:
Another great similarity between these two is to predict where the bowler would bowl. Bradman in his autobiography at several instances had mentioned that he would exactly predict where the bowlers would bowl (Especially in the match where he created the record for the highest score in a first class match). Sachin too is known to be the greatest when it comes to reading the mind of the bowlers. There are several incidents which lay as testimony for this fact. Jadeja said about that, even Amir Khan said about how Sachin predicted every before the bowler actually bowled it during the IPL 1.
Vengeance:
Yeah, you read it right, Vengeance. While Sachin had time and again said that he would never target a bowler, the truth is he has destroyed the careers of many bowlers. Caddick, said he had strategies in place to remove Tendulkar, the next day his ball soared out of the ground and which many revere as the best six of the century. Henry Olanga’s celebration and comments after getting Sachin out, resulted in an onslaught in next match to spoil his career figures altogether. It happened with Shoaib Akthar in world cup 2003, it happened with Shane Warne during the 97-98 series, it happened to Piyush Chawla, who in his first Challenger series got Sachin out with a googly celebrated wildly and in the next series, his first over to Sachin went for 26 runs with all the first 3 balls going for sixes. Sreesanth (during the challenger trophy) bowled a bouncer to which sachin ducked and Sreesanth as usual did his antics and four balls later he was removed from the attack; courtesy Sachin who blasted him for sixes that soared out of the ground and there are many other incidents like this. It is the same with Bradman, in an exhibition match a bowler named Bill Black came on, and the wicket keeper told Bradman that the bowler used to boast about the way he dismissed Don in a previous encounter. That time Australia played 8 ball overs, Black’s first over cost 33 (66424461), then the next over cost 40 (64466464). Black’s second over leaked 29 runs (16611446 – two of the singles came from Bradman’s batting partner). Black was removed from the attack forever. There few other incidents where Bradman targeted a particular bowler and destroyed his figures in first class matches.
Impact:
Don Bradman played and gave happiness to a war torn and economically ravaged Australian people post war. The only happiness for the Australians then was to see Don bat. Matthew Engel, an Englishman, wrote on the day Bradman died: “More than any politician, he gave Australia a unity of purpose and a sense of itself and of its own worth as a country… No sportsman has ever influenced a country’s history to the same extent.”
Likewise, Sachin was the not just a player. I did not live in the same era of Bradman, but to me what Matthew Engel said about Bradman is more applicable to Sachin than any person in the whole world. He was a phenomenon, he sold more televisions in India than any sales genius would do. He halted time, Bus and train drivers would not mind halting their vehicles to see Sachin bat, and companies don’t mind a productivity loss when he plays. His batting was the single biggest happiness for people of India who too were ravaged by political and economic downturn. There was nothing for the Indians to talk about during the 90s; even a fourth place finish in the Olympics was considered a great achievement. Sachin was the one who proved them that Indians can be world beaters too. They took pride in Sachin’s performances. He became a household name; mothers wanted their kids to be like Sachin. It is really hard to explain how he had an impact over the lives of millions in India, and he is continuing to do so. With a billion plus people speaking 18 different languages and 250 odd dialects, those belong to different races, and those who belong to different religion everyone is united by a common string called Sachin. He is a demigod for people, for this single reason he stands heads and shoulders above the rest and in fact even higher than Bradman.
Though it is unfair to compare these two legends, the temptation to rate Sachin above Bradman is too hard to resist, and I would rate Sachin not only above Bradman but also as the best sportsman ever.
“People of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things.” This statement holds good only for Sachin in cricket, every move of his will get in to history.
Sachin’s Birthday Special

Brilliant!!
Comparisons are not new for Master, he always faced that. But in his current form no one would like to compare him with any one.
Thanks Ajith for sharing your thoughts.
Nice one dude
, few more things i came to know
,
Sach is our encyclopedia ( Ajith):)
Hi Admin,
Wow what an article, what a comparison.We started comparing Sachin since 90′s when Lara entered into the world of cricket we are comparing Sachin with every single player who even played one good of his life. From Bradman, Lara, Waugh, Dravid, Ponting, to Sehwag, Inzi, Anwar, Gambhir. Sachin is the scale on which we compare.
Cricages really made my weekend. So many good articles on Sachin and few poems. Keep doing the good work.
Rahul
Speechless!! This article created goose bumps…keep up the good work!! cheers
Numero Uno,
I hope this article will help anti-Sachin people to sut there dirty mouth.
It is ridiculuos to call him the greatest sportsman ever or even the greatest Cricketer.Infact he is not even amongst the top 4 Cricketers of all time.
The greatest Cricketer ever is Sir Garfield Sobers,who could change the complexion of a match in every possible department of the game.He was the equivalent of a prophet to the game,ahead of even Bradman.Overall as a Cricketer I would rate Imran Khan ahead and at his best Kapil Dev could win or turn the complexion of a game to a greater extent.Sachin would rank amongst the top 8 Cricketers of all.
Tendulkar is statistically,the greatest ever batsman combining test matches with one -day Internationals.What tilts the scale in Sachin’s favour is his Muhammad Ali style comeback.Surely in the top 6 batsman of all time.
However it is unfair to rate Sachin as he only true contender to Don Bradman. Sachin has never equalled Viv Richard’s ferocity against great pace bowling,Gary Sobers brilliance in a crisis,Jack Hobbs mastery over wet wickets,the technical prowess of Len Hutton and Barry Richards,the creative genius of Rohan Kanhai or Denis Compton or broken records facing the calibre of bowling combated by Sunil Gavaskar.In the modern era he has also not displayed the same hunger for mammoth scores like Virendra Sehwag or Brian Lara.When the chips were down infact Lara often edged out Sachin carrying the brunt of one of the weakest batting sides.To me it is unfair to rate Sachin ahead of Gary Sobers,Jack Hobbs or Viv Richards.
Where Sachin has stood out is his consistency in both forms of the game and his mastery in the V.He posesses all the qualities of a complete batsman.
It is significant that Bradman is not playing in the modern era or in the 1970-s or 80′s when pace bowling was at it’s best.Infact on wet tracks George Headley and Jack Hobbs were better players,while Stan Mcabe tackled the bodyline attack with greater skill.
Overall to me the most complete batsman of all time was Sir Garfield Sobers.Had he done justice to his talent Rohan Kanhai may well have been the best of all batsman.For sheer batting prowess and creative skill he was the ultimate batsman,closest to genius.
I think we Indians get carried away by sentiment and stats. Calling Sachin the greatest sportsman is carrying hero worship a bit too far. Making comparisons with in a sport is extremely hard leave alone comparing across sports. I listen to the radio show where they analyse American football and nobody goes hyper calling so and so is the greatest but they truly analyse the game and what matters to them is did their team win.
Silly comparisons like this is boring and uncalled for.
Coming back to cricket, I agree with harsh that Gary Sobers, Bradman, Viv and Lara all edge Sachin, regardless of the number of runs he made. Remember Sachin is conscious of records and pursues them, not that he should not but think of it, how would he have been rated if he had retired in 2002 when he was past his best. His longevity is unparalled but that is not the sole measure of greatness. I like to mention Rohan Kanhai and Richards as outstanding talents who did not rise their game in the face of weak opposition or easy circumstances.
If you are not old enough to remember, a game between Rest of the world 11 vs Australia in the early 70′s when Lillee was tearing through the ROW batting lineup, Rohan Kanhai attacked Lillee ferociously and got a hundred. That was pure brilliance. Sachin has not yet played an innings like that, so please do not degrade the greats of the past.
Arun